#GLM

Tutorials, deep dives and product notes — built for developers.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-5.2: 0.7 Points From the Coding King at 1/6 the Price

Claude Opus 4.8 leads every benchmark — but GLM-5.2 is within 0.7 pts on FrontierSWE and 0.8 pts on MCP Atlas. At $4.40 vs $25 per 1M (5.7× cheaper) with MIT open weights, GLM-5.2 is the first open-weight model that makes Opus look expensive. Full 8-benchmark comparison from Z.AI & LLM Stats data.

· 10.1K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.5: The MIT Open-Weight Model That Beats OpenAI's Flagship on Pro

GLM-5.2 (62.1% Pro, MIT open-weight, $4.40/1M) beats GPT-5.5 (58.6%, $30/1M) on SWE-bench Pro by 3.5 points at 1/7 the cost. Also leads HLE w/tools (+2.5), FrontierSWE (+1.8), MCP Atlas (+1.7). GPT-5.5 counters with DeepSWE (+23.8), TB 2.1 (+3.0). Full comparison with 12 shared benchmarks from Z.AI/VentureBeat data.

· 6.3K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

MiniMax M3 vs GLM 5.1: The MIT Open-Weight Coding Battle

MiniMax M3 (59.0% Pro, $1.20/1M, 1M ctx) vs GLM 5.1 (58.4%, $4.40/1M, 200K ctx). Both Huawei Ascend, both MIT, both Chinese. 0.6 pts apart on Pro. M3 leads context + multimodal. GLM leads reasoning + CyberGym #1 + pure MIT + $3/mo plan. Full comparison.

· 4.2K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

Terminal-Bench 2.1 Leaderboard 2026: AI Models Ranked by CLI Coding

Interactive Terminal-Bench 2.1 leaderboard updated with GLM-5.3-Flash at 84.3% and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next added. 50+ models ranked by CLI coding ability. Updated August 28, 2026.

· 31.7K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

SWE-bench Pro Leaderboard 2026: Every AI Model Ranked by Real Coding Ability

Interactive SWE-bench Pro leaderboard: Claude Fable 5.1 takes #1 at 81.2%, with Mythos 5/Fable 5 at 80.3% and Opus 5 at 79.2%. 48+ models ranked by real coding ability. Updated September 3, 2026.

· 52.3K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

Cheapest AI Models for Coding in 2026

17 budget AI coding models ranked by output price ($0.28–$5.00/1M), SWE-bench Pro scores, and real-world CodingFleet speed. DeepSeek V4 Flash cheapest ($0.28). MiniMax M3 best open-weight (59.0% Pro). GPT-5.4 Mini fastest (439.8 char/s). Complete value-per-dollar analysis.

· 6.9K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

Kimi K2.6 vs GLM-5.1: The Open-Weight Coding Showdown (May 2026)

0.2 points apart on SWE-bench Pro. Both open-weight. Both released in April 2026. But the similarities end there. Kimi K2.6 leads on coding (+11.1), agentic tasks (+7.8), and vision. GLM-5.1 counters with pure MIT license, Code Arena #3, and Claude Code compatibility. Here's the definitive comparison.

· 7.3K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

DeepSeek V4 Pro Max vs GLM-5.1: Chinese Open-Weight Coding Models

DeepSeek V4 Pro Max ($0.87/1M, MIT, 1.6T/49B) vs GLM 5.1 ($3.08/1M, MIT, 754B/40B). GLM leads SWE-bench Pro (58.4% vs 55.4%) & HLE w/tools. V4 Pro Max dominates 12/14 benchmarks. 3.5× price gap, 5× context gap. Updated June 9, 2026.

· 9.3K views · Abdeladim Fadheli